<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philosophy lV</title>
	<link>http://www.thenearbyfuture.com/philosophy-lv/</link>
	<description>A fun, informative, and important site to survive the future.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Piratical Lord of the Guitars</title>
		<link>http://www.thenearbyfuture.com/philosophy-lv/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Piratical Lord of the Guitars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thenearbyfuture.com/philosophy-lv/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>You know what I think in some rare cases if it's for the better of others you wish it even though you necessarily don't want it after though you become to want because it would benefit others. So in a way isn't that benefitting others kinda in a way wishing for something you yourself don't want. Or is it still wishing for what you want because you want that person or (those) persons' to be happy. I'm not sure but I'm rambling again. However this is succusses people I managed to concentrate on what in what I was talkig about (generally) the whole time! It does still need improvement sadly, but anyway that's what I thought about the article.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I think in some rare cases if it&#8217;s for the better of others you wish it even though you necessarily don&#8217;t want it after though you become to want because it would benefit others. So in a way isn&#8217;t that benefitting others kinda in a way wishing for something you yourself don&#8217;t want. Or is it still wishing for what you want because you want that person or (those) persons&#8217; to be happy. I&#8217;m not sure but I&#8217;m rambling again. However this is succusses people I managed to concentrate on what in what I was talkig about (generally) the whole time! It does still need improvement sadly, but anyway that&#8217;s what I thought about the article.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
